Debate is a Logical Discussion
Hi All,
Today I will be talking about the oral communication strand in
the language arts curriculum. The skills
that students gain from the oral communication strand help students both
academically and personally. The two main skills that this strand focuses on
are: speaking and listening. It is in language arts classrooms where students
are able to find and explore strategies that can help them develop their
speaking and listening skills.
The past two weeks in class we have been exploring different
strategies that students can use when communicating orally. One of the
strategies that I found most intriguing was the Role Play Debate strategy. I
decided to further research this particular strategy on the website Education World.
For this strategy, students are given an issue or topic to debate, then the
they are assigned different roles or points of view that they have to argue either
for or against.
Connections to the Ontario Language Arts Curriculum p. 9-10:
Students will:
1. listen in order to understand and
respond appropriately in a variety of situations for a variety of purposes;
2. use speaking skills and strategies
appropriately to communicate with different audiences for a variety of
purposes;
3. reflect on and identify their
strengths as listeners and speakers, areas for improvement, and the strategies
they found most helpful in oral communication situations.
The way that this activity is set-up allows for students to
properly examine and reflect on the issue that is up for debate. This lesson
starts off by giving the debate topic to the students then, using an index card,
students identify the key stakeholders in the debate. This introduction to this
activity is important because it allows the students to critically identify and
evaluate both sides of an issue. Next, students are randomly given a side that
they will have to debate—regardless of actual stance on the issue. I think this
is crucial for students to do because it encourages them to be more open to
different points of view when listening to or discussing a specific issue. The
next step in this activity is having students from each side present their argument.
At this time, the rest of the students listen and record questions that they may
have.
After each side has presented their argument, students are
allowed to challenge a particular argument or maybe ask to clarify a particular
point. I think this is a very effective listening strategy because often times
when debates occur each side is so focused on their own arguments, that they fail
to actually listen during the debate. This type of mentality is common in
situations outside of a debate, many people have a difficult time actually
listening when someone else is talking because they are very anxious to share their
own opinion. So, this type of strategy really encourages students to take the
time to listen to another person and to practice the act of noting down
potential questions. Finally, when both sides are done asking question, the class
gathers together and decides which side presented the strongest case. I think
this is a very effective reflective strategy for students because they reflect
on the strengths and weaknesses that they observed and they discuss the actual
process of creating and delivering an effective argument.
Overall, I think that this is a very useful strategy that I could
use in the classroom. However, I would add two important steps in this
strategy: choosing meaningful topics and co-creating debating rules and
expectation. I think that choosing a topic that students are familiar with engages
students’ attention and motivation to do an activity such as this. Also, I
believe that co-creating debating rules or expectations is key to having the
debate run smoothly. By co-creating expectations, students engage in a self-monitoring
process whereby they are more conscious of their behavior during the debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment